" The work of the devil will infiltrate even the Church in a way that others will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against bishops .
The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres ... churches and altars sacked .
The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the Lord's service.
The demon will be especially implacable against souls consecrated to God ..
The only arms that will be the Rosary and the Sign left by My Son.
Each day recite the prayers of the Rosary. pray the Rosary for the Pope, bishops and priests . "
[1973 - Marian apparitions of Akita (Japan) officially approved by the Church .]
The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres ... churches and altars sacked .
The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the Lord's service.
The demon will be especially implacable against souls consecrated to God ..
The only arms that will be the Rosary and the Sign left by My Son.
Each day recite the prayers of the Rosary. pray the Rosary for the Pope, bishops and priests . "
[1973 - Marian apparitions of Akita (Japan) officially approved by the Church .]
"My meetings with Archbishop Capovilla and the Socci-Cardinal Bertone"
Conference for the presentation of the book a "response" significant
Calendasco Piacenza, June 30, 2008
"Come on, write it on a tablet in front of them, inscribe on a document, it remains for the future permanent witness to [...] They say to the seers," Do not let us prophecies sincere, tell us pleasant things, prophesy illusions! Make way out of the way, left the trail, Take away the sight of the Holy One of Israel. " Thus saith the Holy One of Israel: "Since you reject this warning [...] Well this sin will become for you like a breach that threatens to ruin, which projects to a high wall, whose collapse is a snap, sudden, and breaks as a clay jar, crushed without mercy, so that is not found among its fragments not a shard ... "." (Isaiah 30.8 to 14)
"Men of the Church are the Church." (St. Joan of Arc)
"The Church is not some kind of sect or clan seeking to silence us." (Antonio Socci)
Reverend father, spoke very kind,
good evening to all. I am very happy to be here with you, for my book A "response" significant , in this day and closed the month of the Sacred Heart and four decades - yesterday was the exact anniversary - with the Profession of Faith which Pope Paul VI, also listening to the concerns doctrinal espressegli by Cardinal Siri, tried to stem the tide that he will define "demolition of the Church", the result of the "smoke of Satan" that 'for some crack "," entered the Temple of God. " I thank the Society of Sigerico (especially his friend Umberto Battini), I thank each of you of the presence, and then traces a brief introduction to my speech, made up the story of a debate which in fact is, for better or worse, more or less open.
The story of a thwarted debate
The famous Third Secret of Fatima should have been published in 1960, as he had said at the time the surviving seer, "then will be clearer 'and' Madonna wants this. " But this did not happen on the ground (albeit unofficially) that the Vatican did not want to take responsibility to ensure that the words, that the shepherds said to have heard from Madonna, the Madonna was finally, and indeed, three years earlier had advocated in Rome the document itself, because (as relazionerà Cardinal Ottaviani in 1967) is too delicate and explosive to the public domain. Forty years later the mystery of the century, as has been defined, which in the meantime had leaked the various hypotheses, but also qualified witnesses, who were allowed to draft an "identikit" was officially revealed by the Vatican in May - June 2000 Holy Year. Right now, the revelation raised various concerns and widespread. That text, in fact, did not seem to correspond to the 'identikit' already known, or seemed, despite its real drama, a text so sensitive and explosive that it dangerous to publication. So much so that in 2000, not "exploded" anything. It was also a vision of difficult to decipher, so that the same presenters said that theirs was only an attempt at interpretation. The text published in fact, apart from this dark vision of the Madonna did not contain any words that explain strange, Our Lady explained yet clear vision of Hell (the "First Secret"), and has not explained a text that even the Vatican was able to understand with certainty? It was not just the press of 1960 on non-official publication to refer to words that the shepherds said to have heard from Madonna, supernatural origin on which the Vatican had doubts? What had happened to those words - we can say that "soundtrack" in outline view - that the seers had said he intended by Madonna? They were probably discarded because considered not supernaturally real, and then coming not from heaven but from a failure of the visionaries? And that link has the text of 2000, alone, with the date of 1960? No, we met by the card. Bertone, the Vatican has maintained that position on the matter; card. Bertone, who tells us, among other things, that Sister Lucia would say of essersela invented! How is it possible that Sister Lucia told him (behind closed doors and without a tape recorder) to be a liar? These and other questions have arisen spontaneously from many quarters and incurred mainly from the movements of Catholic "traditionalists" generally and "Fatima" in particular, were likely to be asked, by the "mythical" Third Secret of Fatima is the fallen veil, or (as I wrote in the diary) we dropped the veil?
long as those objections, which spread after the speeches of 2000 and some other "peak" had been a bit 'neglected and marginalized in small areas, did not know a great spread through an unforeseen event. The well-known Catholic writer and journalist Antonio Socci, area already estimated by Ratzinger and Cardinal Bertone, who as recently as February 2005 he was deployed with the official position (riepiloghiamola: the completeness of the publication in 2000, the interpretation of the vision for which he was referring primarily Agca's attack on John Paul II May 13, 1981 and the assessment for which Russia had already been consecrated Immaculate Heart of Mary, these three are the key points of the Vatican's official position has been criticized by those who, with different nuances, I disagree), said Antonio Socci, having paid attention to that Fatimid literature, examining and making research on this issue, with admirable intellectual honesty he came to the conclusion that, when he claimed the official was not right. So the good Providence, taking the field against a powerful supporter, reawakened the question out exactly thirteen months after mine, Socci's book, titled ironically and significantly The Fourth Secret of Fatima , in fact, had a great response.
At this point the Archbishop Bertone, flagship of the official position that has become the Vatican Cardinal Secretary of State, having heard that Socci was carrying out an investigation of a certain content on the Third Secret of Fatima was activated immediately to release his volume on the subject: the objections of critics obviously had taken too much scope to continue to oppose, except in rare and limited exceptions, the silence. It 's so released book The Last Seer of Fatima. My conversations with Sister Lucia (always with Rizzoli Editions, who published a book by Socci), in the form of talks with the Vatican's Cardinal Joseph De Carli.
In practice, the answer to the objections of their case. Book followed by other measures - in the first instance of the Cardinal himself - on the same "wavelength", characterized by a triple connotation: the lack of substantive responses and objections to the series of caricatures, one by one, the appeal massive and overflowing, the argument of authority (although at the time of the official presentation of the Secret they said that it is a matter which is not binding, and then, as with any free debate, should rely only on the arguments), the refusal of direct comparisons with "other bell "(so much so that they have always spoken without inconsistent, and I and Socci, Urbaniana go to a presentation of the book card. Bertone, we were put at the door).
Faced with such a response, not even free from abuse, how they reacted to the critics, traditionalists and Fatima or independent? Someone has done a volte-face (a kind of apostasy), and some seem to hiding (and hopefully it will be only my impression always transitory: for example, yes yes no no told me that too many published reviews, and maybe not will have room for another, we hope to have soon), but others, although not enough pressure to silence the microphone and tear, have responded articulately. Noting that, on closer scrutiny, such a response only gives us reason. So Antonio Socci has replicated his part, particularly in the newspaper Libero of Saturday, May 12 and Saturday, June 2, 2007, as well as on its website, the American Joseph Thornborn talked to do his thriller The Fourth Secret ( Piemme editions) a bestseller , between 2007 and 2008, the U.S. Christopher Ferrara, near the famous Father Gruner, also did not unfairly kept silent, and is about to intervene with the book The Secret Still Hidden , which will be officially presented in September, and - you Licet parva ... - Solideo Paolini replied the little book with the subject of this presentation, here it is: A "response" significant (answer, mark, quotation marks), which bears the subtitle : Examination of the book on Fatima card. Bertone, with its sequel: the inconsistencies of the official . December 2007, published by SGM Marche Multimedia. E 'available here, along with some early copies (still with typos Americans, but it captures the sense) of the book Advocate Ferrara, and printed as an appendix to the petition to the Holy Father for the full publication of the Secret; supplication, which I urge readers convinced of the thesis supported therein to send, even photocopying the book, as per instructions. At the end of my speech I will be happy to provide for the usual questions, and will also be a good time for those who wish to request books, on the side, my wife and secretary.
If we really wrong, seriously respond to questions and objections, resolving all the contradictions
Who bears the official line, respond in detail and loyally, detection of all its inconsistencies, to put in light of a whole series of data that contradict it. Answer, but seriously, all the questions and objections presented in this volume, however, not exhaustive (in fact it The Secret Still Hidden there are other yet). Of which you can get an idea - worthy of investigation and verification, reading - the last of the titles of his short chapters: The book and his retinue. The ratio of the book. The paper Overrides of endorsement of the Pope on Sister Lucia? The claim untenable gag criticism Fatima. Insults to critics, caricature of objections. A strange language and nervous. We despise the visionary?! It had to 'verify the authenticity, veracity "of the secret?! And still other evidence. Portrait! Glaring contradictions on the date of 1960. Glaring contradiction on computer use. Glaring mismatch of the size of the envelope containing the secret. Sensational sbianchettatura repetition of a phrase from the letter dated May 12, 1982. Resounding silence on the testimony of Mgr. Capovilla (and others) ... and then another "own goal". The "rigorous" response to the testimony of Cardinal Ottaviani. The persistence in versions unsustainable - 1: To whom it was intended the Third Secret? The stubbornness version unsustainable - 2: What conversion of Russia? The unsustainable solution to the difficulty of the pope who does not die. Prophecy is given to the past? humanum est To err ... oversights or lapses ? An overt fact: 1 - Reports are incomplete and questionable accuracy. An overt fact: 2 - The existence allowed (but left in shadow) of unpublished papers. There are other truths? Absolutely not, indeed can be. Others did not write ... but a development of the Second Secret. "Someone would have taken advantage ...." About the game of Freemasonry (and company). Three arguments absolutely improper against our objections. A recognition overridden. An encouraging news: What led to the publication in 2000. And then in closing, as a result of this, the canonical Supplication to the Pope, which I have already said.
For example, I sit here at one point. In an interview with 30 days of July-August 2006 the card. Bertone, the question: "Is there not something said about Fatima?", He replied: "Absolutely not" (moving on to other statements on the subject). Yet only a year and a half before , to Republic (17 February 2005), said: "If there are stories in her [Sister Lucia] and other papers because we know the truth will be discussed one by one in the beatification process to begin soon. And the cards are a lot because she loved to write. "We believe that in this year and a half have examined all these" many "cards? No, because in his book in May 2007 (attention to the dates) reveal the existence of "several letters" of the visionary still unpublished, and one that Sister Lucia gave to John Paul II to Fatima, "the spotlight , May 13, 2000 - that was made just when the revelation of the third secret - the cardinal states explicitly do not know the contents (and why not investigated?): How can therefore rule out that way in the summer of 2006, that something new and there is significant? For most of that year had left a text (posthumously) awarded to Sister Lucia, where the seer would (the conditional is obligatory) reported an addition to the second secret (it is unclear if his or Madonna). Makes us privy to the Cardinal in his book, before which many were not aware of. And this is something that ask the question, if only out in 2006 (with the support of official position) another piece the second secret, or comment on the second secret, as was the visionary - if he was still lucid and well informed - have said in 2001 Cardinal. Bertone: "Everything has been published, there are no more secrets"? Second, he should have been considered wide open the question of new songs. So how can the champion of their case to answer "absolutely not" when asked if "there is still something not said about Fatima? And if this is just a vague answer to say that complete secrecy is the third published (while the question was broader, Fatima in general), then this, in addition to cast doubt on the accuracy and the solutions of the quotes, would be to delineate the extent of denials uncertain, compatible with reluctance and mental reserves, perhaps the Third Secret published "is everything", because of the non-publication, we found the least likely not authentic supernatural? Or the third secret is all published, because the words that follow the truncated phrase "In Portugal we will always keep the dogma of faith, etc.." Still belong to their private opinion, the second and the third secret? (And if so, would be the second secret known incomplete "if it is not soup, pan is wet"). Or: we revealed all understood: something by publishing it and something covertly, without indicating the source, in other sermons, such as the famous Via Crucis at the Colosseum on March 25, 2005? Or is everything else there ... because the new text has been lost or destroyed, as was envisaged in his diary Cardinal Ottaviani? Swear on the Bible to exclude that there is some truth in each of these four scenarios, one by one? Swear on the Gospel that Sister Lucia has never written a sequel of the sentence on the Conservation of orthodoxy, who has never written an "Annex" which explains the vision published in 2000? Swear on the Gospel that I have never been reticent on these matters from 2000 onwards, using perhaps a mental reservation?
For my part, I am available to answer any honest criticism of our thesis that it is not merely a repeater of someone to whom we have already responded - in which case refer to the relevant literature.
And if everything has been said, the issue is too serious to ignore
And if everything has been said, Everyone has the right and duty to speak up against this injustice (is that even if did not feel to ensure the supernatural origin - should also be evident that for reasons I explained in my Do not despise prophecies - since in the current legislation the contents of any appearance, recognized or not, have all been liberalized, and the then Bishop of Fatima made firm commitments, promising publication: pacta sunt servanda ... Why continue on this route runs a double risk. From a natural point of view, the risk very heavy pressure and blackmail the Vatican, by the enemies of the Church who know how things went, and who have an interest to blackmail that the "Fourth Secret" - or some trace of his existence ol'affermazione and how things went - "to remain in the drawer." And this not only do we say: so much so that on the Republic of February 20, 2005, to say the judge is even prior, for years proprietor of the investigation on the assassination to the Pope From the perspective of spiritual and supernatural the risk of chilling disasters, and knowing exactly which declared that text could be avoided or at least mitigated, they are not, not having been given to each transparent and full opportunity to use these warnings as they are. As We should not insist that you grasp the outstretched hand of the Queen of the prophets, when we know of the prophecies of doom that weigh just because of the delay the execution of the directives of Heaven? Although there was only a small chance that Sister Lucia has not been wrong in writing this text - assumptions that Msgr. Capovilla, while being driven in the opposite direction, I was not included at all - how can we try them all? With the 'silent apostasy "(Pope John Paul II), before the Church that is a boat about to sink (the card. Ratzinger, who was elected Pope by the Holy Spirit on that platform), ahead of nuclear war is the horizon, as do not try this help? As at least try not to let those who want to get it? Want the "litmus test" of the rightness and importance of this publication? Satan does not want it. When Sister Lucia, on the orders of his bishop, he had to write the third part of the Secret, in late 1943, had a block. He could not write it. This block, says the historian and authorized non-controversial father, Alonso was not of natural origin. Excluding that it was of supernatural origin (so much so that in January 1944, Our Lady appeared to Sister Lucia and will answer "word for word" in preparing and ensuring that the will was of God), we have to source: preternatural. Diabolical. Previously, in fact, the devil had manifested his dislike of this: when he sent in crisis Lucia just before the transmission of the Secret, and made him doubt inspiring them using the following account: Mr. Cure think that appearances are probably a deception of the devil can I have more reason for my pastor? And when you know that Satan is against the knowledge of that message, I think everyone can easily make a choice of field.
... Will permitting. Because many times the problem is just that. Hostility Part of the unprecedented secrecy is based on four pillars: the anti-Christian circles, who do not want their plots to be made in light of the sun; church that perhaps, in various ways and sizes, were caught by the situation, and the misinformation (favored also by the prevailing distraction); opportunism, which pull back (or forward in the wrong field) in front of what looks like a lost cause, and perhaps cause problems. Or benefits, if the contrast is: so it does not seem to miss those who, eager to be "the manger", to make a career, sometimes to recycle, try to apply for accreditation with the zealous denial of the "fourth secret." Maybe someone is repugnant not hope to sell the power, but the idea of \u200b\u200bbeing fairly sharp operators tricking. So, leaving aside here the four stories in support of their case (this is what they said no, it would be too great, then why post in half, to be trusted, never mind), to which I have, and we have already responded in writing I would now like to make a succession of sad examples of turarsi ears and wash their hands so uncomfortable, finally drawing conclusions.
most honest of all was the priest, who had said he was convinced that there is something hidden, which therefore had brought the petition for the full publication: "I want to compromise." Just so that the world would never become a Christian, since those who have been there for his conversion tools have compromised a bit 'much ... But the worst was that religious, it was all friendly until the theory (or the gossip ), which began to slow down when I gave him the plea: "I do not think the Pope will do, you see ...." I replied with the greatest gospel to which we must not judge according to appearance, but with proper discretion, and with what was said by Our Lady to St. Catherine Laboure: when you believe everything lost, the one time I will be [means: more than ever, particularly ] with you. Also - rimarcai - beyond what they will or will not make the Holy Father, and beyond if - they told me in different - I'll show or not (but would not rule out that the reigning Pope is sufficiently prudent to take precautions Sue ), the Lord and Lady will see for sure, and still appreciate the gesture of asking Their help this and this, in any case, that's something. He told me then that he could not say that the Secretary of State, and perhaps the Pope, were liars (although 'I think', literally), and while I talked Socci well why not risking anything. I pointed out: As the speech of liars, that we would not put it so, that the reality was more complex (and sent back for further Literature that dealt with the question), as for me and Socci that does not risk anything, that he could not know. So far it was, well, uninspiring, but at least sincere. Emerging that it was not a great figure, with a turnaround began to change the registry: it is doubtful that have not published everything! I expressed my amazement that so far had enthusiastically agree with my Do not despise prophecies ... He said I was referring to what I read, my approval could not cover the parts where they have not arrived. Come on dad, we're not talking about a detail contained in the footnote of page 693 287: the hot central thesis of the book is already enunciated in the subtitle, conspicuously printed on the cover! How can it not noticed? Answer: he cut off all contact. It 's a sad spiritual dynamic, but significant and recurrent. A group of lay faithful, who are also the "traditionalists" in response (solicited) sending the petition had argued: we do not think it is appropriate to accede to the proposal that, among other things, might embarrass the Pope, being Officially he was to present the third secret ... (so they know how things are), after all, he already knows the demands of Madonna is already doing what it takes. Or (explicit) do not need another. It 'a logic that I had already heard: the attachment of the third secret, in fact, was ordered by the Curia of Pope Pius XII and Cardinal Ottaviani, who certainly wanted to avoid further development in the Church, being notoriously opposed to the new theology, but thought likely to succeed them, in a less disruptive, less awkward, more skilled. And we have seen. The story does not teach anything? humanum est To err, persevere ... past few months and the same group of traditionalists complained that the government diocesan environments, after a promising start mistreat them about the so-called Tridentine mass. And - I say - Pope Ratzinger will not help them at the present and certainly not because he does not want, having very good intentions, but because, with so much resistance and the real application of the Motu proprio , as you may think that can effectively cope with it, permanently, without extraordinary help from above? Conditional aid promised to do as Naaman the Syrian. I wrote them, have a think about what he says the Roman Catechism? Too bad, especially when invested with authority, are instruments of God ... Another priest told me: I do not think you have to cross us ... if the secret novel about a crisis in the Church there is no need to publish it because we already know. And so, father, Madonna would be less wise than she? Would give us aid we do not need? With these assumptions, with this way of thinking, it will deepen and certainly will not understand the nature of an extraordinary warning from Heaven, is not formal order of the supreme and absolute, full of heavenly wisdom, which if accepted is an amazing help, and if rejected likely to anticipate - as Sister Lucia said the father Fuentes - the sin against the Holy Spirit that we know what our Lord said. Or the person who, on another specific point, told me: right, but the Holy Father has a clear idea (hence, by implication, do nothing). I agree, but the Pope is a man (as Peter is "the sweet Christ on earth," as Simone is a man) among many who tell him "impossible, impractical, it would be a disaster," few branches encouragement will be far from inappropriate. As noted in his book the lawyer Ferrara, in which Motu proprio liberalizing the old liturgy is the Pope himself to refer to the insistent pleas to do so. In addition to the appearance of not to ratification by the general public silence, such a injustice. It is significant that in Italy the initiative petition has been accepted by most laity from the clergy, without comparison, and that instead the clergy of the South American has reserved a better reception (although the Cardinal that, at least, has responded to the petition but not with a deafening silence by giving a positive assessment was not, needless to say, Italian). Now about to start a similar petition, also inspired by this, North America, and there, also saw the results of that initiative years ago, you can expect the collection of several signatures, all in all, the underlying trends are clear.
***
The conclusion is a bit 'strong, but clap me I prefer to say the truth: the collection of certain reactions and non-response is troubling, because it seems to foreshadow a collective guilt. The guilt of contempt and rejection, in some way, the rescue plan of Heaven - endorsed by exceptional importance in its many events, including the largest public miracle after crossing the Red Sea, the miracle of the sun - so uncomfortable or afraid such. Preferring to trust in men. With the possible outcome of making the predicted bloodshed the only way out, because the agency chose not to accept the other. The international situation not nice. We read, we open our hearts to the grace, pray much, especially for the Holy Father, we say the Rosary, let the first five Saturdays of the month, the consecration of persons, families and parishes to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, do penance (including the conversion intellectual change of mindset), we bear witness, because in extremis be able to avoid, or decrease, the complete realization of a tragedy from which we had been warned. Thanks.
Solideo Paolini
Solideo Paolini , a "response" SIGNIFICANT. Examination of the book on Fatima card. Bertone, with its sequel: the inconsistency of their case. SGM Publishing Multimedia, December 2007, 85 pages, € 9.66 . (NB: The book should be required to : SGM Multimedia, via Aldo Moro, 10 , Stafford (AN) . Tel 0731.779846 . Fax 0731.771783 . Info@sgmmultimedia.it)
http://nullapossiamocontrolaverita.blogspot.com/
http://nullapossiamocontrolaverita.blogspot.com/
